Teaching with Social Media and Digital Technologies

At New York University, Professor Clifford Siskin has required students to create wikis to accompany class presentations (example). Professor Michael Wesch posts videos for other academics on how to use Twitter, YouTube videos, collaborative Google Docs to replace traditional lectures in the classroom. The Wired Campus has run a series of articles on the use of Twitter as a teaching tool (check the links here). Casting Out Nines ran an article on how teachers can use Facebook. And recently, Columbia University’s Center for New Media Teaching and Learning developed a multimedia classroom tool called “MediaThread” which “connects to a variety of image and video collections (such as YouTube, Flickr, library databases, and course libraries), enabling users to lift items out of these collections and into an analysis environment” where they can be “clipped, annotated, organized, and embedded into essays and other written analysis” (http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/mediathread). These are just a few examples of the ways in which digital technology and social media are entering the classroom environment.

Personally, I’ve not yet used anything more advanced than Blackboard course pages and Powerpoint presentations in my teaching. My favored form of technology in the classroom is the blackboard. I might occasionally embed a video clip or demonstrate how to use a database, but none of that is particularly sophisticated. I tend to use digital technology in lecture as a means to gain student attention, or to make a specific point for which I think the medium is well suited. I know that this technology, particularly social media, has the capacity for more than entertainment, but I remain uncertain of its value in the classroom.

Some professors have argued against incorporating digital technology and social media in the classroom, arguing that flashy tech distracts already highly distractable students from the lesson, and that attention to including new tech may distract teachers from the point that tech was meant to reinforce. Others claim that using social media and other innovative digital technologies will assist teachers in reclaiming students’ attention, and when I see students disregarding a valuable lecture in favor of texting, tweeting, updating Facebook, and searching the web, I want to believe that jumping on the tech bandwagon will draw them back into the classroom.

So I’m asking for advice: how do you use digital technology in your classroom? Or do you? Why or why not? What drawbacks have you encountered, and what successes? How do the technologies you employ affect your pedagogical practices? Perhaps together we can sort out the most effective ways to integrate modern forms technology into our teaching practices.

~Veronica Goosey

Introducing MediaThread

This term I’ve been visiting Mark Phillipson’s Multimedia Blake, a senior English seminar at Columbia University. As its title suggests, the course offers a non-traditional approach to William Blake’s poetry through an in-depth analysis of his written texts as much as his images. Phillipson uses MediaThread in the class, an innovative software program created by Columbia’s Center for New Media Teaching and Learning (CCNMTL) that facilitates such an examination of Blake’s multimedia production.

As the Center’s website indicates, the software “connects to a variety of image and video collections (such as YouTube, Flickr, library databases, and course libraries), enabling users to lift items out of these collections and into an analysis environment. In MediaThread, items can then be clipped, annotated, organized, and embedded into essays and other written analysis” (http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/mediathread).

I believe the above description does more than justice to represent this fascinating tool; it brings new meaning to engaged academic communities by redefining online classroom technology. Based on my observations, the program works very well not only for its seminar purposes but also, I dare say, for new possibilities in Blakean Studies. Its zooming and “lifting out” capabilities of the minutest of details (from each digitized image) lend to fruitful observations and discussion that a view of the printed image could hardly reproduce. Through the use of digitized images from the wonderful blakearchive.org, MediaThread allows for a side-by-side analysis, for instance, of Blake’s representations of females, Los, Urizen, or even his peculiar trees. Students can also scrutinize the many versions of Blake’s images—including his varying use of color, shading, strokes, and other remarkable details.

Programs like Blackboard, Sakai, or other related course technology certainly have their merit by offering pre or post-classroom intellectual exchange, but these conversations are usually limited to written textual analysis. MediaThread enables the simultaneous analysis of text and multimedia. It allows classroom participants new entryways into a work’s material conditions, permitting the potential reframing of its production and reception history. It also prompts several questions about current forms of access to literary works—including new ways of reading and analyzing a text. With this software, students could conceivably examine other digitized images of, say, original manuscripts or rare (first) print editions. And if such a program can revolutionize the classroom, why would it (or something like it) not eventually change the sphere or direction of literary scholarship or even the broader digital humanities? The possibilities seem very exciting.

Because of its promising features , we are hoping to ask Mark Phillipson or any other member of Columbia’s team to give a presentation on MediaThread to our NYU English Department faculty and graduate students. We will provide our followers with updates about this potential event in the near future.

-Omar F. Miranda